Facebook censors an entry about Charlie Kirk. “No, it must be a mistake”

Shot at the University of Utah Valley, Charlie Kirk was a figure with expressive views, he strongly divided the listeners and many of his supporters claim that he died for freedom of speech. It is all the more surprising that the critical analysis devoted to him has disappeared from Polish Facebook.

Charlie Kirk criticized in Polish analysis. FIRMLY Facebook reaction

“I just wanted to say that if it seemed to you that you saw some post here on the profile, then you were right – you thought. Freedom of speech on this noble digital platform is unlimited, glorifying murderers from behind a don is allowed, put paid advertisements based on fakes AI slowly, but create entries against the message of the right -wing mainstream,” Piotr Wilkin.

Wilkin is a doctor of philosophy specializing in the issues of language philosophy, co -creator of the “Homo est via ecclesiae” foundation, writing for “ties”, but also publishing extensive texts on Facebook. The newest was devoted to Kirk and the reaction of the American right to his death.

The publicist has already turned to the Minister of Funds and Regional Policy Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and the minister of digitization Krzysztof Gawkowski to this matter. “It would be nice if we finally did something with the Niezhoł, the digital gentlemen from overseas, who monopolized us of digital space, now they throw in the far -right propaganda, and in addition, without any possibility of dismissal, they remove critical messages. I only toss it, because it is slowly doing grotesque” – he wrote to the mentioned politicians.

Najder with censorship on Facebook. “Debate fanatics”

The writer Łukasz Najder also sounded the situation. “It was from Facebook that Piotr Wilkina flew, in which he wrote, among others, about the amoral nihilism of the modern right,” achievements “of Kirk and when patriots condemn something, and when they are silent or rolling beca” – he informed.

“What’s going on? After all, these are just words, how our devotees of absolute freedom of speech, fanatics of debates, tireless enthusiasts of dialogue, black humor, provocation and extremely absurd theses like to repeat. Hand censorship, “he added.

Facebook removed the text about Charlie Kirk. Rightly?

Taking advantage of the author’s publicly expressed consent, we publish the whole text dedicated to Charlie Kirk. Let the reader make a mind if the boundaries have been crossed here, forcing Facebook to react and delete both the original material and its copies from other profiles by the platform.

There are few things that clearly show the amoral nihilism of the modern global right (I will not call it Alt-Piga, because it probably doesn’t make any sense, since this current finally took over and appropriated right-wing movements practically in the whole world of the broadly understood West), such as the reaction to the murder of Charli Kirk.

Who was Charlie Kirk? Well, Charlie Kirk was a guest whose life mission was a shit on “subhuman” – which, depending on the humor or available eRistic ammunition, were: the leftist academics (his organization Turning Point USA published the “black list” in the comments section of virtually any liberal-leftist commentator who was still survived at X/Twitter), Latinos, black (last days before his death he spent organizing racist shit on black Americans by assigning them collective responsibility for murdering a refugee from Ukraine, which was killed by a black criminal-a guy) … He practically did nothing in his life, but pointed his finger enemies.

Of course, as for a right -wing American, he was onuca (he repeated all the standard texts about the Nazis in Ukraine, Zelenski as a US puppet, he demanded the cancellation of help for Ukraine and the devotion of Russia Crimea), but also a fanatical supporter of the right to have a weapon – to such an extent that after one, in turn, a shooter in the US school spoke, how we can not let the family victims “and” The second amendment is worth these few deaths from firearms annually. ”

What was his attitude towards violence in politics? Well, it’s enough to say that when the madman pushed into the house of the Pelosia and almost smashed the ax of his husband Nancy Pelosi, Paul, Charlie Kirk announced to everyone that … some real patriot should pay a deposit for the attacker – and then “ask him some questions” (which was an allusion to a completely rolled up conspiracy theory, so that Pelosi was cryptoge, and the attacker his rejected lover).

Well, now let’s see what’s going on. Suddenly the whole right -wing infosfer (and it is powerful, I want to laugh, when the right wing talks about “mainstream media”, in Poland the largest weekly weekly, or “Sunday Guest”, every week, he reprinted the right -wing word propaganda from the “Catholic” press every week, until today the whole ecosystem of official Catholic media begins his “press” and LifeSitenews) tries to make a new saint from Charlie Kirk. And it tries to do it in an absolutely grotesque way, making it a pattern of all kinds of virtues. Trump has already announced national mourning, draining the flags from the masts and wants Kirka posthumously.

Then why am I talking about amoral nihilism now? I am in a hurry to inform. Well, the whole right, American and not only American, was enthusiastic with holy anger and indignation at the murderer. Of course, the left is guilty, although the perpetrator has not yet been caught and not even identified. The outrage at violence is densely poured, the American Department of State officially announced that it would excrete from the USA (and forbid the entry) to foreigners who … dared to die from Kirk’s death. Yes, you are not mistaken, an oasis of freedom of speech, a country where the first amendment is holiness, will excrete people or refuse them to enter the heheszki on Facebook. One of the congressmen went even further, demanding the adoption of the law, according to which digital platforms will be obliged to give life to the banks of Banas to people enjoying the death of Kirk.

Let’s go back a bit. Literally 3 months ago, a democratic state senator from Minnesota, Melissa Hortman and his husband, are shot. The murderer is also trying to kill another senator, but luckily he manages to get into life. A list of nearly 70 democratic or generally liberal politicians and activists was found at the perpetrator.

What does our right do? Is it indignant and condemned? And where there. Trump is limited to ensuring that “there is no place for terrible violence.” There is no national mourning or medals. But it is still Versailles with what other right -wing politicians do. Senator Mike Lee with the support of Donald Trump Junior and Elon Musk spreads conspiracy theories that the principal of the murder was the governor of Minnesota and the candidate for Vice President Tim Walz, and the whole was a “quarrel in the family.” He also publishes a picture with a portrait of the murderer and the signature of “nightmare on Walz Street” during the roundabout. Earlier, the same happened during the attempt to murder Nancy Pelosia, where her husband is seriously wounded. I have already mentioned the distributed conspiracy theory, it is significant that Charlie Kirk personally took part in the passage of murder.

And that’s how it turns. There are simply no values ​​for these people. If the case concerns their “enemies”, they hit the slogans “Freedom of speech” – which is to be simply a convenient excuse to give up all decorum and propagate lies and rat. But if the case concerns someone with “their” – they suddenly turn on the unbelievable pathos. Suddenly freedom of speech stops counting, the value of human life suddenly begins, although Kirk himself underestimated this value. Suddenly the same people who expressed the holy indignation that the services in the UK would arrest people for inciting specific acts of violence on X/Twitter, calling this complete death of freedom of speech and murderism and instructing Europeans about freedom of speech (see the famous speech of JD Vance), they want to exclude people from the country or refuse them for … ” Making Light of Kirk’s death. ”

In fact, the right wing simply made up for postmodernity. Challenging the left from the “moral relativists” and “cultural marksists” themselves in a perfect way implemented the recommendations of Rorty about (un) liberal irony. No rules apply, only the principle of persuasion applies. If your actions convince others effectively, you won, if not, you lost.

Well, if you can create a media ecosystem that will convince you that the murder of a leftist is that, hehe, you know, probably a quarrel in the family or a lover murdered him, but the murder of the rightist is an incredible, epoch -making crime and of course proof of extreme barbarism and the wildness of the left, which of course is responsible for this, since the cancellation of the appearances of right -wing speeches under the pressure of students Cancel Culture, but throwing a lecturer from work, who at the lecture on gender dared to talk about gender, because he was reported by a brave right -wing activist who, of course, recorded a lecture, this is the right fight against demoralization and corruption, it should be done and just win a tribal war.

And the fact that in this tribal war all traditionally right -wing values ​​and their caricatures remained, that, apart from racism, sexism and unrestrained greed, there is no values ​​there, does not matter. The ground that “ours” won. Oh, and they are against abortion. Let’s remember. It justifies all and changes everything.